Mechanical and histological evaluation of amorphous calcium phosphate and poorly crystallized hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants.

Abstract

The effect of amorphous calcium phosphate (Ca/P) and poorly crystallized (60% crystalline) hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings on bone fixation to "smooth" and "rough" (Ti-6A1-4V powder sprayed) titanium-6Al-4V (Ti) implants was investigated. Implants were evaluated histologically, mechanically, and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after 4 and 12 weeks of implantation in a rabbit transcortical femoral model. Histological evaluation of amorphous vs. poorly crystallized HA coatings showed significant differences in bone apposition (for rough-coated implants only) and coating resorption (for smooth- and rough-coated implants) that were increased within cortical compared to cancellous bone. The poorly crystallized HA coatings showed most degradation and least bone apposition. Mechanical evaluation, however, showed no significant differences in push-out shear strengths between the two types of coatings evaluated. Differences between 4 and 12 weeks were significant for coating resorption and push-out shear strength but not for bone apposition. Significant enhancement in interfacial shear strengths for bioceramic coated as compared to uncoated implants were seen for smooth-surfaced implants (3.5-5 times greater) but not for rough-surfaced implants at 4 and 12 weeks. Rough implants showed greater mean interfacial strengths than uncoated smooth implants at 4 and 12 weeks (seven times greater) and to coated smooth implants at 12 weeks only (two times greater). Mechanical failure of the bone/coating/implant interface consistently occurred within the bone, even in the case of the poorly crystallized HA coatings, which had almost completely resorbed on rough implants. These results suggest that once early osteointegration is achieved biodegradation of a bioactive coating should not be detrimental to the bone/coating/implant fixation.