Abstract

In seismic risk estimation, among the different types of fragility curves used (judgement-based, mechanical, empirical/observational, hybrid), the mechanical ones have the twofold advantage of allowing a better control over the basic parameters and of representing a validation test of the consistency of empirical/observational ones. In this study, fragility curves of RC frames with column-driven failures are obtained from a simplified analytical pushover method implemented in a simple spreadsheet, thus allowing the user to perform a large number of analyses. More importantly, the proposed method introduces the concept that Limit States at the structural level are obtained consequent to the attainment of the same Limit States at the local level, in the columns’ sections. This avoids using additional criteria, such as interstorey drift thresholds. This simple analytical model allows for rapid development of fragility curves, for any Limit State, of different building typologies identified by a set of global quantities (number of storeys, story heights, number of spans and span lengths) and by a set of local quantities (element sizes, reinforcement, and material properties). It also allows for a straightforward treatment of the influence of the soil class on the fragility curves parameters, which is another critical issue addressed in this work that helps when interpreting some literature results using empirical/observational methods.

Highlights

  • In the recent past, the topic of seismic risk analysis and mitigation has attracted the research community worldwide

  • Fragility Curves are a useful tool for conducting risk analyses at an urban, provincial, or regional scale of territorially diffused building stocks

  • One of the methods to develop fragility curves relies on statistical processing of the data numerically produced by means of models representing the construction typologies in the region of interest

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The topic of seismic risk analysis and mitigation has attracted the research community worldwide. One of the main components of seismic risk is the vulnerability of structures. Dunand and Guneguen [3] showed that, even in regions with moderate seismic hazard, a high seismic risk can be found if the seismic vulnerability of the construction stock is high. A convenient and widely adopted method for defining seismic vulnerability is the use of Fragility Curves (FCs). Such curves provide the probability of exceeding a Limit State (LS) or a Damage Level (DL) as function of a seismic intensity measure

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call