Abstract

Background: We identify the agricultural inputs that drove the growth in global and regional crop yields from 1975 to the mid-2000s. Methods: We compare and contrast the inputs that drove yield change as identified by econometrically estimated yield functions and decision trees that use yield change as the class attribute. Results: We find that improvements in agricultural science and management, increased fertilizer use, and changes in crop mix around the world explained most of the gain in global crop yields, although the yield impacts of input use varied across the latitudinal gradient. Climate change over this time period caused yields to be only slightly lower than they would have been otherwise. In some cases, cropland extensification had as much of a negative impact on global and regional yields as climate change. Conclusions: To maintain the momentum in yield growth across the globe 1) the transfer of agricultural chemicals and investment in agricultural science and management in the tropics must increase rapidly and 2) international trade in agricultural products must expand significantly.

Highlights

  • A consensus has emerged that recent climate change has had a negative effect on crop yields around the world (e.g., 1–4)

  • We find that improvements in agricultural science and management, increased fertilizer use, and changes in crop mix around the world explained most of the gain in global crop yields from 1975 to the mid-2000s

  • Our results indicate that 1) transferring better agricultural science and management and other inputs to the tropics, 2) encouraging countries to exclusively concentrate on growing the crops most suited to their soil-climate conditions, and 3) focusing on increasing the productivity of existing cropland in lieu of concentrating on cropland extensification will be the most effective ways to ameliorate climate change’s expected drag on global yields

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A consensus has emerged that recent climate change has had a negative effect on crop yields around the world (e.g., 1–4). We find that improvements in agricultural science and management (e.g., technology and chemical use), increased fertilizer use, and changes in crop mix around the world explained most of the gain in global crop yields from 1975 to the mid-2000s. Results: We find that improvements in agricultural science and management, increased fertilizer use, and changes in crop mix around the world explained most of the gain in global crop yields, the yield impacts of input use varied across the latitudinal gradient. Climate change over this time period caused yields to be only slightly lower than they would have been otherwise. Conclusions: To maintain the momentum in yield growth across the globe 1) the transfer of agricultural chemicals and investment in agricultural science and management in the tropics must increase rapidly and 2) international trade in agricultural products must expand significantly

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call