Abstract
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen can be divided into labile and recalcitrant pools according to the time it takes to be cycled. The way in which carbon and nitrogen pools are cycled and distributed between labile and recalcitrant pools can directly relate to soil quality. This paper tested the hypothesis that labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen vary between agricultural soils with different species and fertilization management systems (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium need) under tropical conditions. This study aimed to examine the impact of land-uses on stocks and losses of carbon and nitrogen under tropical conditions. We explored labile (soil microbial biomass and labile carbon) and recalcitrant carbon pools (humin, humic acid, and fulvic acid) in forested and agricultural soils, defined as latosol (forest, fertilized pasture, and unfertilized pasture) and cambisol (forest, coast pasture, sugarcane, and silage corn). Forested soil was used as an appropriate use to soil conservation in tropical that presents levels adequate of carbon and nitrogen stocks and biological condition in soil. Results showed that pools of labile and recalcitrant carbon are different on soil layers and the use of soil. Forest use in cambisol and latosol promoted higher labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen due to the greater environmental stability without human intervention. On the other hand, human intervention occurred in fertilized pasture and coast pasture; however, both uses presented similar recalcitrant carbon and nitrogen pools when compared to forested soil on the soil surface due to fertilizer uses and the high volume of the grass root system. Overall, our findings reveal that under tropical conditions, agriculture and forested soil can present similar recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen if agricultural soils are associated with the appropriate fertilizer management. Pasture with adequate fertilization management systems can be used as an alternative to recover degraded areas with low levels of recalcitrant carbon and nitrogen pools.
Highlights
Soil organic matter (SOM) quality and management is the main factor to be considered in sustainable agricultural production [1]
Total organic carbon (TOC) is represented by the sum of labile and recalcitrant pools, which is characterized as a heterogeneous mixture of organic materials in soil, complex organic compounds, fresh litter, and carbohydrates [5,6]
There was a notable difference between agricultural soils for the surface group (Group 3), with comparatively higher dispersion among observations (Figure 1)
Summary
Soil organic matter (SOM) quality and management is the main factor to be considered in sustainable agricultural production [1]. The misuse and bad management of natural ecosystems for agricultural activities can result in losses that exceed 50% of the carbon in the SOM, especially in sandy soils [4]. Labile carbon pools (LCP) can be represented by soil microbial biomass (SMB) and labile carbon (labile-C), which exhibit characteristics of fast decomposition and are a great indicator of soil quality [1]. Total organic carbon (TOC) is represented by the sum of labile and recalcitrant pools, which is characterized as a heterogeneous mixture of organic materials in soil, complex organic compounds, fresh litter, and carbohydrates [5,6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
