Measuring Stakeholder Assessments of Postsurgical Facial Scars: A Retrospective Cohort Inter-rater Analysis of Patients, Physicians, and Medical Student Observers.

Abstract

The relationship of postoperative facial scar assessments among patients, physicians, and societal onlookers is not clearly defined. To identify differences in perceived scar outcomes by different stakeholders. Retrospective cohort study at a single Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) center during which scars were assessed by: patients, physicians, and medical student observers not involved in patients' care using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (v.2). Eighty-one patients graded their scars at 2 visits: 1 to 2 weeks post-MMS and 3 months post-MMS. Deidentified patient photographs were taken at each visit and graded by 4 physicians and 12 observers. At week 1, there was a significant difference in overall opinion of scar appearance between patient and physicians (p = .001) and medical student observers and physicians (p < .001). Physicians graded scars more favorably. At 3 months, there remained a difference in scar evaluations between patient and physicians (p = .005), whereas medical student observers rated scars more similarly to physicians (p = .404). Postoperative scar perceptions differ among stakeholders. Physicians must be mindful of this disparity when counseling patients in the perioperative setting to align patient expectations with realistic scar outcomes.