Abstract

In 2003 Monk and colleagues published a single-administration replacement for a standard sleep diary, the Sleep Timing Questionnaire (STQ). Reliable and valid for adult participants, it offers advantages over existing methodologies in cost and convenience. It takes approximately 10 min to complete but can yield information equivalent to a week of actigraphy, or a 2-week sleep diary. This study sought to validate the STQ for school-age children. Sixty-five children (20 boys, 45 girls), aged 11–16 years participated in this study. The participants wore wrist actigraphs, completed a 1-week sleep diary and the STQ. Analyses tested convergent validity between the STQ and actigraphy, and the STQ and sleep diaries. Correlations between STQ and actigraphy (r = 0.45–0.76, P < 0.001), and STQ and sleep diaries (r = 0.42–0.86, P < 0.001), were positive and significant for sleep onset and wake times. Correlations between STQ and actigraphy for sleep latency and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were very low (r < 0.10). In contrast, sleep latency was moderately and significantly correlated between STQ and sleep diary (r = 0.42, P < 0.001), and the correlation for WASO was high and significant (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). Differences between the STQ and sleep diary were within acceptable limits for all sleep parameters, and the differences between STQ and actigraphy were acceptable for sleep onset and school day wake time. The STQ may be a valid indicator of sleep onset and wake time in school-age children. It can also produce measures of sleep latency and WASO with comparable accuracy to a standard sleep diary.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.