MEASURING RATIO AND CONVERGENCE OF JURISPRUDENTIAL DOCUMENTATION IN LIGHT OF LOSSES CAUSED BY CORONA TRANSFER

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the civil liability of coronavirus epidemic transmission. The research method is descriptive - analytical and library type. In the realization of the triple elements of the verb or to transmit the coronavirus, the causality and causality relation between them (verbs and harm), the civil liability resulting from the transmission of the coronavirus epidemic is any condition, reason or reason to which the coronavirus epidemic can be attributed. Other laws that can be cited in the area of infection include the Civil Liability Act, "Whoever, as a matter of recklessness, pays compensation to the life or health of the person for any harm, whether moral or physical, is responsible for compensation for his act". In Iranian law, the legal basis of the civil liability of coronavirus epidemic transmission factors is based on negligence theory. But the assumption that the transmission of the coronavirus is carried out by hospitals and health care centers or centers that provide treatment and medical care is a form of responsibility, as they are bound by the rules. The basis of Islamic jurisprudence responsibility is that a dangerous disease transmission is based on the principle of No harm. The research findings indicate that the civil liability territory of coronavirus epidemics is where damage can be assigned. In Iranian law, the agents of the epidemic coronavirus have an obligation to compensate the material damages and any possible loss of benefits. However, there is no doubt that moral damages can be claimed, but there is no doubt that such compensations are due to impact of loss and loss.