Abstract
BackgroundDespite the growing literature on the efficiency and productivity of the Chinese healthcare system, less attention has been given to examining the undesirable outputs linked to healthcare services, including environmental pollution. Taking the atmospheric environmental pollution resulting from the incineration of medical waste as an undesirable output of the healthcare system, this study analyzed the growth and decomposition of Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of healthcare services across 31 Chinese provinces during the period 2005–2016.MethodsThe Meta-frontier undesirable super-efficiency slack-based measure (SBM) model and the Global Malmquist-Luenberger (GML) Index were employed to analyze the growth and decomposition of TFP using the Max DEA software.ResultsThe results revealed that the years 2009 and 2015 marked significant changes in TFP of healthcare services in Chinese provinces. During the study period, the rate of technological change (TC) slowly declined, whereas the rate of efficiency change (EC) steadily increased. With the national average being the benchmark, the results indicated that: the TFP of 17 provinces and cities exceeded the average, the EC of 16 provinces and cities exceeded the average, the TC of 9 provinces and cities exceeded the average, and the value in the Technology Gap Ratio (TGR) changes of 13 provinces and cities were above the national average.Conclusions(1) The TFP of the healthcare services across China continued to decline slowly during the study period. (2) The effect of technical catch-up in the eastern, central, and western regions of China was significant across the three regions, whereas the effect of technical innovation was negative. (3) The TFP varied considerably among the Chinese provinces. These findings suggest that, under existing environmental constraints, relevant government departments should improve technical innovation in the supply of healthcare services and medical waste treatment, increase technical efficiency in the factor of healthcare production, strengthen regional health planning, and balance the development of regional healthcare.
Highlights
Despite the growing literature on the efficiency and productivity of the Chinese healthcare system, less attention has been given to examining the undesirable outputs linked to healthcare services, including environmental pollution
Because the data used in this study are panel data, it is necessary to conduct a descriptive statistical analysis of the relative values, in addition to conducting descriptive analysis of the absolute values
Emissions from undesirable outputs in the eastern region far exceed the central and western regions, with the western region having the lowest share of undesirable outputs
Summary
The average annual growth rate of TFP, EC, BPC, and TGC in the central region is −0.02, 1.12, −1.43%, and 0.65%, respectively These results indicate that the decline of TFP in the central region is restricted by the effect of technological innovation. The average annual growth rate of TFP, EC, BPC, and TGC in western China is 0.72, 1.73, − 0.45%, and 0.12%, respectively These results imply that the growth of TFP in the western region relies on the catch-up effect, while the innovation effect is not significant. TFP changes, changes in technological efficiency, technological changes, and changes in the TGR have negative growth These regions have governmental policy support, which resulted in a substantial increase in health inputs, there is a lack of human resources due to weaknesses in their economic and geographic conditions. This means that a lack of human resources relative to material health resources can lead to the inefficiencies in the provision of medical services and hinder development
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.