Abstract

Pharmacist time use was studied to examine whether fixed-interval work sampling would provide results comparable to those obtained when random-interval observations were used. The study was conducted over a three-month period using pharmacists in a single community pharmacy as subjects; similar study methods have been used in hospital settings. Four separate measures of pharmacist time use were designated: tasks, duties, competencies and productivity. In every case the fixed-interval method gave an estimate that was not significantly different from the random-interval procedure (alpha greater than 0.05, difference of proportions test). The findings suggest that pharmacist work patterns are not sufficiently cyclical to introduce a bias in work sampling by fixed intervals. Fixed-interval work sampling yields results comparable to those using the standard work sampling methods that rely upon random time periods between observations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call