Abstract

<p class="Abstract">Supply chains lack their own across-the-board managers that can design and implement a performance measurement system (PMS), nor do they have an explicit overall strategy from which the PMS can be derived. The focus of this article is to develop a qualitative theoretical model on PM in supply chains to explore how to adopt PMS as a tool to implement collaboration and integration in chains. The exploratory nature of the research question determined our use of a multiple case study. Two focal firms in the agro-food sector from Spain and the Netherlands, serving a total of five different chains, illustrate the message of the model.</p>The findings show when an attempt to implement a PMS at the supply chain level might be appropriate and effective (if a chain exists and has a director), and how the system’s content should be focused on what is needed to improve chain performance (with end customers’ demands as a starting point). The paper highlights the benefits obtained by the other partners if they comply with the best informed supply chain member in the development of the chain’s PMS, as well as how a PMS cannot be developed when none of the partners can be labelled as chain director.

Highlights

  • Carter, Carter, Monczka, Slaight,& Swan (2000) included performance measurement as one of the top ten areas of research interest in SCM for the 1998-2008 period

  • Many of the articles on supply chain performance measurement system (PMS) concentrate on what measures and metrics to use (e.g., Beamon & Chen, 2001; Gunasekaran, Patel, & Tirtiroglu, 2001; Folan & Browne, 2005; Bhagwat & Sharma, 2007; Martin & Patterson, 2009; Arif-UzZaman & Nazmul Ahsan, 2014)

  • This paper has examined who in a supply chain can, effectively, take the initiative to implement SCI by means of a PMS, i.e., decide what measures and metrics to use and how to implement them

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carter, Monczka, Slaight,& Swan (2000) included performance measurement as one of the top ten areas of research interest in SCM for the 1998-2008 period. The difference at the aggregation level has some significant consequences, and measuring performance in the framework of the supply. Measuring performance at the supply chain level: the role of the chain director De Haan, J.A.C.; Sacristán-Díaz, M. chain remains difficult. Many questions relating to PMS, as a tool to implement collaboration and integration in supply chain implementation, evolution and maintenance remain (Aykuz & Erkan; 2010; Gopal & Thakkar, 2012; Shepherd & Gunter, 2006), considering, in addition, that developing a PMS for the supply chain is a dependent process, tailored to specific supply chain requirements (Cuthbertson & Piotrowicz, 2011)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call