MEASURING NON-ECONOMIC WELL-BEING ACHIEVEMENT

Abstract

It is common to treat human well-being as a multidimensional concept, enveloping diverse, separable or behaviourally distinct components, domains or dimensions (Finnis 1980; Nussbaum 1988; Sen 1990, 1993; UNDP 1990–2003; Doyal and Gough 1993; Galtung 1994; Cummins 1996; Qizilbash 1996; Stewart 1996; Narayan 2000; Alkire 2002, among many other studies).1 It is in particular thought to be a much richer or vital concept than economic well-being: much of the literature is justifiably emphatic about this point. Accordingly, there is a long history of efforts both to refocus attention away from the established, although invariably far less than perfect, monetary measures of national economic well-being achievement and to capture better non-economic well-being achievement. A plethora of indicators of national well-being achievement has been proposed for these purposes. Indicators of health and educational status are most widely-used in inter-country ordinal and cardinal assessments of national well-being achievement, and are now available for diverse samples of 160 or more countries (see UNDP 2003). Multidimensional indicators are also available for similar samples, based either solely or predominantly on these indicators, and include the Physical Quality of Life Index (PQLI) and the very well-known Human Development Index (HDI).