Abstract

Numerous methods have been used by the aeroacoustics community to locate noise sources of different frequencies in subsonic jets. These include: acoustic mirrors, microphone arrays, two-microphone methods, causality correlation and coherence techniques, acoustic beamforming, and automated source breakdown. Except for the acoustic beamforming, most of these methods are quite time consuming. No one seems to have ever compared the performance of these techniques. This paper compares the performance of various existing techniques. As the beamforming technique is the least time consuming, emphasis has been given to examining the performance of this technique in measuring source location in a subsonic jet for a range of Reynolds numbers. A 48-microphone acoustic beamformer was used to locate the noise sources for several subsonic Mach numbers from a one-inch and a half-inch nozzle. The effects of tabs on source location are also examined for the one-inch nozzle. Once set up, this method allows for faster and thus more numerous tests. It is shown that jet noise source locations may be a strong function of either Reynolds number or nozzle exit boundary layer. In general, there is a shift of all the noise sources away from the nozzle exit as Reynolds number decreases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.