Abstract

Material decomposition methods are used to identify and quantify multiple tissue components in spectral CT but there is no published method to quantify the misidentification of materials. This paper describes a new method for assessing misidentification and mis-quantification in spectral CT. We scanned a phantom containing gadolinium (1, 2, 4, 8 mg/mL), hydroxyapatite (54.3, 211.7, 808.5 mg/mL), water and vegetable oil using a MARS spectral scanner equipped with a poly-energetic X-ray source operated at 118 kVp and a CdTe Medipix3RX camera. Two imaging protocols were used; both with and without 0.375 mm external brass filter. A proprietary material decomposition method identified voxels as gadolinium, hydroxyapatite, lipid or water. Sensitivity and specificity information was used to evaluate material misidentification. Biological samples were also scanned. There were marked differences in identification and quantification between the two protocols even though spectral and linear correlation of gadolinium and hydroxyapatite in the reconstructed images was high and no qualitative segmentation differences in the material decomposed images were observed. At 8 mg/mL, gadolinium was correctly identified for both protocols, but concentration was underestimated by over half for the unfiltered protocol. At 1 mg/mL, gadolinium was misidentified in 38% of voxels for the filtered protocol and 58% of voxels for the unfiltered protocol. Hydroxyapatite was correctly identified at the two higher concentrations for both protocols, but mis-quantified for the unfiltered protocol. Gadolinium concentration as measured in the biological specimen showed a two-fold difference between protocols. In future, this methodology could be used to compare and optimize scanning protocols, image reconstruction methods, and methods for material differentiation in spectral CT.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSpectral (multi-energy) computed tomography is an extension of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) or single energy CT

  • Spectral computed tomography is an extension of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) or single energy CT

  • These results demonstrate that the methodology can be used to compare how different scanning protocols using one material differentiation method affect the measurement of the concentration of materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spectral (multi-energy) computed tomography is an extension of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) or single energy CT. Sci. 2018, 8, 467 information to improve contrast discrimination and material decomposition [1]. The potential to use spectral information for decomposing the linear attenuation coefficient into two or more basis for material discrimination ( called material decomposition MD) was proposed by Alvarez and Macovski in 1976 [20]. They analyzed the material decomposition in the projection image domain (pre-reconstruction). Later in 1977, Brooks [21] successfully demonstrated the dual energy material decomposition method in the reconstruction image domain (post-reconstruction)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.