Abstract
Collaborative group work plays an important part in postsecondary education, and the ability to assess the quality of such group work is useful for both students and instructors. The purpose of this study was to develop a self-report measure of students' perceptions of the quality of their interactions during collaborative educational tasks. Collaborative interactions were operationalized using the construct of heedful interrelating, which is interacting with sensitivity to the task at hand while at the same time paying attention to how one's actions affect overall group functioning. In Study 1 (N = 111 undergraduates; Mage = 20.3 years; 78% female) both factor stability, assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic techniques, and convergent validity were established for the six-item Heedful Interrelating in Collaborative Educational Settings (HICES) scale. In Study 2 (N = 147 undergraduates; Mage = 20.5 years; 82% females) the HICES scale's factor structure was further supported via acceptable model fit of cross-validating sample, and predictive validity was established in terms of the HICES scale's positive relationship with performance. The results of these studies support the reliability and validity of the six-item HICES scale. Implications for use of the HICES scale in research and practice are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of School & Educational Psychology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
