Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare scintigraphy, the standard method, and the (13)C-octanoic acid breath test (OBT) for measuring gastric emptying. Patients with functional dyspepsia (N = 21, 8 men and 13 women; ages, 40-75) underwent standardized dynamic scintigraphy and OBT. Scintigraphic images were obtained for 90 min and breath samples for 4 hr. The gastric half-emptying time for solids (T(1/2)) was calculated by two previously described mathematical models for the OBT samples: the nonlinear least-squares method and the geometrical method. T(1/2) was significantly longer measured by OBT than by scintigraphy (167 +/- 50 min for the nonlinear least-squares method (P < 0.05) and 185+/- 52 min for the geometrical method (P < 0.005) vs. 109 +/- 74 min for scintigraphy). No correlation appeared between T(1/2) measured by scintigraphy and T(1/2) measured by OBT (r = 0.26) for nonlinear least-squares method and (r = -0.13) for geometrical method). Furthermore, the correlation between the two mathematical models appeared to be low (r = 0.15). Although OBT is simple and safe, its correlation with scintigraphy appears to be weak. The usefulness of this test for measuring gastric emptying thus requires further validation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
