Abstract

This article is a critical analysis of the methodology of press freedom indices of two independent international watchdog organizations, Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org/) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF- https://rsf.org/en). The author argues that press freedom indices tend to offer us a homogenous view of mass media, which facilitates comparisons between countries by masking significant differences and discusses the challenges of dealing with the difference in the conceptualization of media freedom. As a social scientist, she also brings validity and reliability issues, which are crucial in quantitative research methods, into the discussion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call