Abstract

Background‘Non-parametric directionality’ (NPD) is a novel method for estimation of directed functional connectivity (dFC) in neural data. The method has previously been verified in its ability to recover causal interactions in simulated spiking networks in Halliday et al. (2015). MethodsThis work presents a validation of NPD in continuous neural recordings (e.g. local field potentials). Specifically, we use autoregressive models to simulate time delayed correlations between neural signals. We then test for the accurate recovery of networks in the face of several confounds typically encountered in empirical data. We examine the effects of NPD under varying: a) signal-to-noise ratios, b) asymmetries in signal strength, c) instantaneous mixing, d) common drive, e) data length, and f) parallel/convergent signal routing. We also apply NPD to data from a patient who underwent simultaneous magnetoencephalography and deep brain recording. ResultsWe demonstrate that NPD can accurately recover directed functional connectivity from simulations with known patterns of connectivity. The performance of the NPD measure is compared with non-parametric estimators of Granger causality (NPG), a well-established methodology for model-free estimation of dFC. A series of simulations investigating synthetically imposed confounds demonstrate that NPD provides estimates of connectivity that are equivalent to NPG, albeit with an increased sensitivity to data length. However, we provide evidence that: i) NPD is less sensitive than NPG to degradation by noise; ii) NPD is more robust to the generation of false positive identification of connectivity resulting from SNR asymmetries; iii) NPD is more robust to corruption via moderate amounts of instantaneous signal mixing. ConclusionsThe results in this paper highlight that to be practically applied to neural data, connectivity metrics should not only be accurate in their recovery of causal networks but also resistant to the confounding effects often encountered in experimental recordings of multimodal data. Taken together, these findings position NPD at the state-of-the-art with respect to the estimation of directed functional connectivity in neuroimaging.

Highlights

  • Questions regarding the causal relationships between anatomically connected regions of the brain have become of fundamental importance across many domains of neuroscience (Sporns 2010; Swanson 2012)

  • non69 parametric directionality (NPD) estimates are equivalent to estimates of Granger causality but are more robust to signal confounds

  • In the final experiment of this paper, we investigate how the two directed functional connectivity (dFC) metrics (NPD and non-parametric Granger causality (NPG)) perform when estimating the dFC between the cerebral cortex and the subthalamic nucleus (STN)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Questions regarding the causal relationships between anatomically connected regions of the brain have become of fundamental importance across many domains of neuroscience (Sporns 2010; Swanson 2012). A novel method for estimating directed functional connectivity (dFC), termed non parametric directionality (NPD), has been recently described in Halliday (2015). This method has been demonstrated to yield physiological insights into the connectivity of the cortico-basal-ganglia network when applied to (continuous) field recordings made in rodents (West et al 2018). Similar to the role played by coherence in measuring undirected functional connectivity, Wiener-Granger causality has emerged as a first-choice estimator of directed connectivity due to its well established theoretical basis (Bressler and Seth 2011; Ding et al 2006) and its successful application to questions concerning causal networks inferred from large-scale neural recordings Similar to the role played by coherence in measuring undirected functional connectivity, Wiener-Granger causality has emerged as a first-choice estimator of directed connectivity due to its well established theoretical basis (Bressler and Seth 2011; Ding et al 2006) and its successful application to questions concerning causal networks inferred from large-scale neural recordings (e.g. Brovelli et al 2004; Richter et al 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call