Abstract
ObjectivesTo examine (1) how a rapid data collection using a convenience sample fares in estimating change in alcohol consumption when compared to more conventional data sources, and (2) how alcohol consumption changed in Finland and Norway during the first months of the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodsThree different types of data sources were used for the 2nd quarter of 2020 and 2019: sales statistics combined with data on unrecorded consumption; the rapid European Alcohol Use and COVID‐19 (ESAC) survey (Finland: n = 3800, Norway: n = 17,092); and conventional population surveys (Finland: n = 2345, Norway: n1 = 1328, n2 = 2189, n3 = 25,708). Survey measures of change were retrospective self‐reports.ResultsThe statistics indicate that alcohol consumption decreased in Finland by 9%, while little change was observed in Norway. In all surveys, reporting a decrease in alcohol use was more common than reporting an increase (ratios 2–2.6 in Finland, 1.3–2 in Norway). Compared to conventional surveys, in the ESAC survey fewer respondents reported no change and past‐year alcohol consumption was higher.ConclusionThe rapid survey using convenience sampling gave similar results on change in drinking as conventional surveys but higher past‐year drinking, suggesting self‐selection effects. Aspects of the pandemic driving alcohol consumption down were equally strong or stronger than those driving it up.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.