Measuring brain perfusion by CT or MR as ancillary tests for diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To gather and synthesize evidence regarding diagnostic accuracy of perfusion imaging by CT (CTP) or MR (MRP) for brain death (BD) diagnosis. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022336353) and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and independently by 3 reviewers. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant studies. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to assess studies’ quality. Meta-analysis was performed using univariate random-effects models. Results Ten studies (328 patients) were included. Perfusion imaging (most commonly CTP, n = 8 studies) demonstrated a high sensitivity of 96.1% (95% CI, 89.5-98.6) for BD, consistent in subgroup analysis at 95.5% (95% CI, 86.5-98.6). Unfortunately, it was not feasible to calculate other metrics. Additionally, evidence of publication bias was identified in our findings. Conclusions The sensitivity of CTP or MRP for BD diagnosis is very high, comparable to CTA and TCD. However, considering most studies were retrospective, and lacked control groups and unambiguous criteria for perfusion imaging in BD assessment, results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies, ideally prospective, multi-centre, and with control groups are of utmost importance for validation of these methods, particularly with standardized technical parameters. Advances in knowledge Cerebral perfusion imaging using CT or MRI demonstrates high sensitivity in diagnosing BD, on par with CTA and TCD. Recommended by the World Brain Death group, this method holds promise for further investigation in this area. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022336353