Abstract

AbstractWe present a novel method for measuring the fluctuating basal normal and shear stresses of debris flows by using along‐channel seismic recordings. Our method couples a simple parameterization of a debris flow as a seismic source with direct measurements of seismic path effects using empirical Green's functions generated with a force hammer. We test this method using two large‐scale (8 and 10 m3) experimental flows at the U.S. Geological Survey debris‐flow flume that were recorded by dozens of three‐component seismic sensors. The seismically derived basal stress fluctuations compare well in amplitude and timing to independent force plate measurements within the valid frequency range (15–50 Hz). We show that although the high‐frequency seismic signals provide band‐limited forcing information, there are systematic relations between the fluctuating stresses and independently measured flow properties, especially mean basal shear stress and flow thickness. However, none of the relationships are simple, and since the flow properties also correlate with one another, we cannot isolate a single factor that relates in a simple way to the fluctuating forces. Nevertheless, our observations, most notably the gradually declining ratio of fluctuating to mean basal stresses during flow passage and the distinctive behavior of the coarse, unsaturated flow front, imply that flow style may be a primary control on the conversion of translational to vibrational kinetic energy. This conversion ultimately controls the radiation of high‐frequency seismic waves. Thus, flow style may provide the key to revealing the nature of the relationship between fluctuating forces and other flow properties.

Highlights

  • Debris‐flow and lahar monitoring sites commonly make use of along‐channel seismic instrumentation for event detection, monitoring, flow characterization, and scientific research

  • We present a novel method for measuring the fluctuating basal normal and shear stresses of debris flows by using along‐channel seismic recordings

  • From the space‐time flow snapshots (Figures 5a and 5b), extracted velocities (Figures 5c and 5d), videos (Logan et al, 2018), and seismic data (Figure 6), we found that the two experimental debris flows behaved at first but quickly diverged in their behavior, a consequence of their different starting conditions (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Debris‐flow and lahar monitoring sites commonly make use of along‐channel seismic instrumentation for event detection, monitoring, flow characterization, and scientific research. Applications span many scales, from debris flows in small alpine catchments (e.g., Arattano & Moia, 1999; Badoux et al, 2009; Hürlimann et al, 2019; Kean et al, 2015; McArdell et al, 2007) to great volcanic lahars (e.g., Hadley & LaHusen, 1991; Lavigne et al, 2000; Leonard et al, 2008; Marcial et al, 1996; Suwa et al, 2011) The limitation of such seismic monitoring systems is that they are qualitative or site specific.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call