Abstract

Auditory neuroscience in dolphins has largely focused on auditory brainstem responses; however, such measures reveal little about the cognitive processes dolphins employ during echolocation and acoustic communication. The few previous studies of mid- and long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in dolphins report different latencies, polarities, and magnitudes. These inconsistencies may be due to any number of differences in methodology, but these studies do not make it clear which methodological differences may account for the disparities. The present study evaluates how electrode placement and pre-processing methods affect mid- and long-latency AEPs in (Tursiops truncatus). AEPs were measured when reference electrodes were placed on the skin surface over the forehead, the external auditory meatus, or the dorsal surface anterior to the dorsal fin. Data were pre-processed with or without a digital 50-Hz low-pass filter, and the use of independent component analysis to isolate signal components related to neural processes from other signals. Results suggest that a meatus reference electrode provides the highest quality AEP signals for analyses in sensor space, whereas a dorsal reference yielded nominal improvements in component space. These results provide guidance for measuring cortical AEPs in dolphins, supporting future studies of their cognitive auditory processing.

Highlights

  • Bats and dolphins have sophisticated auditory systems for echolocation, making them of particular interest to comparative studies of auditory processing

  • We adopted a method commonly used in human auditory brainstem response (ABR) analysis (Elberling and Don 1984), which was previously applied to dolphin ABR measurements using a similar recording paradigm to that used here (Finneran et al 2019)

  • By comparing responses measured in different reference electrode montages, we find that a meatus electrode served as the best reference for sensor-space auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) measures, whereas a dorsal electrode served as the best reference for component-space measures, in terms of largest SNRL and peak-to-peak measures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bats and dolphins have sophisticated auditory systems for echolocation, making them of particular interest to comparative studies of auditory processing. Noninvasive auditory brainstem response (ABR) methods have been thoroughly developed to study dolphin hearing at early response latencies, on the order of 1–10-ms post-stimulation (for a review, see Supin et al 2001). These methods have been increasingly used to study the processing of the animal’s own outgoing biosonar signal and incoming echoes,.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call