Abstract

Abstract. We present a detailed investigation of the factors governing the quantification of formic acid (FA), acetic acid (AA), and their relevant mass analogues by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), assess the underlying fragmentation pathways and humidity dependencies, and present a new method for separating FA and AA from their main isobaric interferences. PTR-MS sensitivities towards glycolaldehyde, ethyl acetate, and peroxyacetic acid at m/z 61 are comparable to that for AA; when present, these species will interfere with ambient AA measurements by PTR-MS. Likewise, when it is present, dimethyl ether can interfere with FA measurements. For a reduced electric field (E/N) of 125 Townsend (Td), the PTR-MS sensitivity towards ethanol at m/z 47 is 5–20 times lower than for FA; ethanol will then only be an important interference when present in much higher abundance than FA. Sensitivity towards 2-propanol is <1% of that for AA, so that propanols will not in general represent a significant interference for AA. Hydrated product ions of AA, glycolaldehyde, and propanols occur at m/z 79, which is also commonly used to measure benzene. However, the resulting interference for benzene is only significant when E/N is low (≲100 Td). Addition of water vapor affects the PTR-MS response to a given compound by (i) changing the yield for fragmentation reactions and (ii) increasing the importance of ligand switching reactions. In the case of AA, sensitivity to the molecular ion increases with humidity at low E/N but decreases with humidity at high E/N due to water-driven fragmentation. Sensitivity towards FA decreases with humidity throughout the full range of E/N. For glycolaldehyde and the alcohols, the sensitivity increases with humidity due to ligand switching reactions (at low E/N) and reduced fragmentation in the presence of water (at high E/N). Their role as interferences will typically be greatest at high humidity. For compounds such as AA where the humidity effect depends strongly on the collisional energy in the drift tube, simple humidity correction factors (XR) will only be relevant for a specific instrumental configuration. We recommend E/N ~ 125 Td as an effective condition for AA and FA measurements by PTR-MS, as it optimizes between the competing E/N-dependent mechanisms controlling their sensitivities and those of the interfering species. Finally, we present the design and evaluation of an online acid trap for separating AA and FA from their interfering species at m/z 61 and 47, and we demonstrate its performance during a field deployment to St. Louis, USA, during August–September of 2013.

Highlights

  • Formic acid (HCOOH, formic acid (FA)) and acetic acid (CH3COOH, AA) are among the most abundant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere

  • Chemicals were introduced to the proton-transferreaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) inlet system using the permeation system described above except for glycolaldehyde, which was introduced by flowing ultrapure air (10 sccm) through 1/4 PFA tubing housing a small amount of crystalline glycolaldehyde dimer (Sigma Aldrich) on glass wool at temperatures of 26–35 ◦C

  • We carried out an in-depth study of the processes governing the detection and quantification of formic acid, acetic acid, and a suite of related species by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Formic acid (HCOOH, FA) and acetic acid (CH3COOH, AA) are among the most abundant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), a chemical ionization technique, allows simultaneous detection of a broad range of VOCs with high sensitivity and fast time response (de Gouw and Warneke, 2007). A few of the previous CIMS-based studies of FA and AA reported direct calibrations to quantify the instrument response for these compounds in the field (Haase et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2006a; Veres et al, 2008, 2011) due to the difficulty of producing reliable gas-phase standards (de Gouw and Warneke, 2007). We quantify the instrumental response to AA, FA, and their respective mass analogues as a function of E/N (the ratio of the electric field to gas number density in the PTR-MS drift tube) and humidity, and assess how these factors impact the sensitivity, specificity, and stability of carboxylic acid measurements by PTR-MS. USA, during August–September of 2013 and discuss the extent and variability of interferences for AA and FA measurements by PTR-MS in an urban region impacted by biogenic emissions

Experimental design and performance
PTR-MS and inlet system
Memory effects for AA and FA
Permeation-based VOC calibration system and its validation
Sensitivities
Humidity dependence of PTR-MS sensitivity toward AA and FA
Implications for ambient measurements of FA and AA by PTR-MS
F A ethanol
Deployment and performance in the field
Trap performance
Time series of measured compounds
Findings
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call