Abstract

Background: Deficits in interjoint coordination, such as the inability to move out of synergy, are frequent symptoms in stroke subjects with upper limb impairments that hinder them from regaining normal motor function. Kinematic measurements allow a fine-grained assessment of movement pathologies, thereby complementing clinical scales, like the Fugl–Meyer Motor Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMMA-UE). The study goal was to investigate the effects of the performed task, the tested arm, the dominant affected hand, upper limb function, and age on spatiotemporal parameters of the elbow, shoulder, and trunk. The construct validity of the metrics was examined by relating them with each other, the FMMA-UE, and its arm section.Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study including chronic stroke patients with mild to moderate upper limb motor impairment. Kinematic measurements were taken using a wearable sensor suit while performing four movements with both upper limbs: (1) isolated shoulder flexion, (2) pointing, (3) reach-to-grasp a glass, and (4) key insertion. The kinematic parameters included the joint ranges of shoulder abduction/adduction, shoulder flexion/extension, and elbow flexion/extension; trunk displacement; shoulder–elbow correlation coefficient; median slope; and curve efficiency. The effects of the task and tested arm on the metrics were investigated using a mixed-model analysis. The validity of metrics compared to clinically measured interjoint coordination (FMMA-UE) was done by correlation analysis.Results: Twenty-six subjects were included in the analysis. The movement task and tested arm showed significant effects (p < 0.05) on all kinematic parameters. Hand dominance resulted in significant effects on shoulder flexion/extension and curve efficiency. The level of upper limb function showed influences on curve efficiency and the factor age on median slope. Relations with the FMMA-UE revealed the strongest and significant correlation for curve efficiency (r = 0.75), followed by shoulder flexion/extension (r = 0.68), elbow flexion/extension (r = 0.53), and shoulder abduction/adduction (r = 0.49). Curve efficiency additionally correlated significantly with the arm subsection, focusing on synergistic control (r = 0.59).Conclusion: The kinematic parameters of the upper limb after stroke were influenced largely by the task. These results underpin the necessity to assess different relevant functional movements close to real-world conditions rather than relying solely on clinical measures.Study Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03135093 and BASEC-ID 2016-02075.

Highlights

  • Incidences of upper limb impairments after stroke have been reported in 48 to 85% of acute stroke patients (Jørgensen et al, 1999; Persson et al, 2012)

  • Throughout the course, deficits in interjoint coordination have been described as a key feature in stroke-related dysfunctions that is characterized by the reappearance of primitive movement synergies and the presence of joint coupling (Krakauer and Carmichael, 2017)

  • The study sample represents 26 mild to moderately impaired chronic stroke subjects, of whom 14 subjects were affected in their dominant upper limb

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Incidences of upper limb impairments after stroke have been reported in 48 to 85% of acute stroke patients (Jørgensen et al, 1999; Persson et al, 2012). Throughout the course, deficits in interjoint coordination have been described as a key feature in stroke-related dysfunctions that is characterized by the reappearance of primitive movement synergies and the presence of joint coupling (Krakauer and Carmichael, 2017). Determining the level of interjoint coordination and associated motor dysfunction of stroke-related movement disabilities is critical to improve our understanding and expand interventional strategies to minimize long-term consequences due to stroke. Deficits in interjoint coordination, such as the inability to move out of synergy, are frequent symptoms in stroke subjects with upper limb impairments that hinder them from regaining normal motor function. The construct validity of the metrics was examined by relating them with each other, the FMMA-UE, and its arm section

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call