Abstract

As the foundation for detailed hierarchical combustion chemistry models, the accuracy of the hydrogen oxidation mechanism is paramount to achieve truly predictive models. The recent introduction of new chemically termolecular reactions to this system suggests that our understanding of this fundamental chemistry could have initially been plagued with structural inaccuracies that have been carried along in the development of larger thermochemical mechanisms. Consequently, there is a need for additional independent experimental data in various experimental setups to assess the accuracy of model predictions. An atmospheric jet-wall stagnation-flame configuration is used in this work to measure the reactivity of premixed, lean-to-rich hydrogen-air flames diluted with argon. Mixtures with estimated adiabatic flame temperatures of ∼1800K are obtained by argon dilution to maintain the oxygen-nitrogen ratio while allowing for stable, laminar flames over the desired conditions. The accuracy of various thermochemical mechanisms available in the literature is assessed with direct comparisons of the velocity profiles in the stagnation configuration obtained through Particle Tracking Velocimetry to the solution of the quasi–1D flame simulation. Unstretched laminar flame speeds (SLo) are subsequently inferred using a direct comparison technique between the experiments and the simulations at multiple stretch values, similarly to a non-linear extrapolation to unstretched conditions. Significant discrepancies are observed between model predictions and experimental measurements, which supports the current efforts in model development. The inaccuracies in kinetic rates of the hydrogen oxidation model must first be resolved to avoid optimization and validation errors in the hierarchical development of increasingly complex hydrocarbon mechanisms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call