Measurements of nitrogen oxides and ozone fluxes by eddy covariance at a meadow: evidence for an internal leaf resistance to NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;

P Stella,F X Meixner,C Ammann,T Foken,M Kortner,I Trebs

doi:10.5194/bg-10-5997-2013

Abstract

Abstract. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) plays an important role in atmospheric pollution, in particular for tropospheric ozone production. However, the removal processes involved in NO2 deposition to terrestrial ecosystems are still the subject of ongoing discussion. This study reports NO2 flux measurements made over a meadow using the eddy covariance method. The measured NO2 deposition fluxes during daytime were about a factor of two lower than a priori calculated fluxes using the Surfatm model without taking into account an internal (also called mesophyllic or sub-stomatal) resistance. Neither an underestimation of the measured NO2 deposition flux due to chemical divergence or an in-canopy NO2 source nor an underestimation of the resistances used to model the NO2 deposition explained the large difference between measured and modelled NO2 fluxes. Thus, only the existence of the internal resistance could account for this large discrepancy between model and measurements. The median internal resistance was estimated to be 300 s m−1 during daytime, but exhibited a large variability (100–800 s m−1). In comparison, the stomatal resistance was only around 100 s m−1 during daytime. Hence, the internal resistance accounted for 50–90% of the total leaf resistance to NO2. This study presents the first clear evidence and quantification of the internal resistance using the eddy covariance method; i.e. plant functioning was not affected by changes of microclimatological (turbulent) conditions that typically occur when using enclosure methods.

Highlights

Hydrology and Nitrogen oxides (NOx, tEheasrutmh Sofynsittreicmoxide, NO, and ntoitcrhoegmenistdriyoxoifdet,heNOat2m) opslpahyearenS. iBcmyipeocnrotacnntetrorslolilneginthtehelepvheolsof key radical species such as the hydroxyl radical (OH), NOx are key compounds that influence the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere
relative humidity (RH), decreased during the morning to reach its minimum of 65 % after noon (Fig. 2b)
This resulted in considerable variability of the meteorological conditions during the experiment: maximal global radiation (Gr) and Ta ranged between 200 and 800 W m−2, and 15 and 25 ◦C, respectively, and minimal RH varied between 80 and 50 % (Fig. 2a and b)

Summary

Introduction

Hydrology and Nitrogen oxides (NOx, tEheasrutmh Sofynsittreicmoxide, NO, and ntoitcrhoegmenistdriyoxoifdet,heNOat2m) opslpahyearenS. iBcmyipeocnrotacnntetrorslolilneginthtehelepvheolsof key radical species such as the hydroxyl radical (OH), NOx are key compounds that influence the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere. Hydrology and Nitrogen oxides (NOx, tEheasrutmh Sofynsittreicmoxide, NO, and ntoitcrhoegmenistdriyoxoifdet,heNOat2m) opslpahyearenS. IBcmyipeocnrotacnntetrorslolilneginthtehelepvheolsof key radical species such as the hydroxyl radical (OH), NOx are key compounds that influence the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere. O3 is a well-known greenhouse gas responsible for positive radiative forcing, i.e. contributing to global warming, representing 25 % of the net radiative forcing attributed to human activSitioeslisdincEe athretbheginning of the industrial era (Forster et al, 2007). Due to its oxidative capacities, O3 is a harmful pollutant responsible for damages to materials (Almeida et al, 2000; Boyce et al., 2001), human health (Levy et al, 2005; Hazucha and Lefohn, 2007) and plants (Paoletti, 2005; Ainsworth, 2008). O3 TmhayeleaCd rtoyboiosdpivheresirtyelosses, while in agro-ecosystems, it induces crop yield losses (Hillstrom and Lindroth, 2008; Avnery et al, 2011a, b; Payne et al, 2011)

Methods

Results

Conclusion