Measurement Properties of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Objective: To critically appraise and summarize the quality of the measurement properties of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory's (DHI) in adult patients with complaints of dizziness. Databases Reviewed: Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL. Methods: The selected literature databases were systematically searched to identify studies investigating one or more measurement properties of the DHI. From the included studies, relevant data were extracted, their methodological quality was assessed, the results were synthesized and the evidence was graded and summarized according the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Results: The search strategy resulted in 768 eligible publications, 42 of which were included in the review. Overall, evidence on the DHI's content validity was either lacking or limited and of low quality. Moderate evidence was found for inconsistent structural validity, sufficient construct validity and borderline sufficient responsiveness. Based on the studies included, low evidence was found for sufficient reliability of the DHI total score. No evidence synthesis could be done for the DHI's internal consistency due to multidimensionality (i.e., lack of support of the original subscales) and for its measurement error due to a lack of published information on the minimal important change. Conclusions: The current evidence for a number of measurement properties of the DHI is suboptimal. Because of its widespread use and the current lack of a better alternative, researchers can use the DHI when assessing handicapping effects imposed by dizziness, but they should be aware of its limitations. Moreover, we recommend using the DHI total score only and also to consider adding an instrument with more favorable measurement properties when assessing self-perceived handicap in patients with dizziness.