Abstract

This in-vitro study aimed to investigate whether intraoral scanners (IOS) are suitable for wear measurement compared to optical profilometry (WLP). A zirconia cast representing the teeth (24–28) was fabricated. It was digitized six times using three different intraoral scanners, Cerec Omnicam AC (OC), Trios 3 (Tr3), and True Definition (TD). The scans were conducted at baseline (t0) and at three different stages of simulated wear (t1–t3), each at one wear-facet on FDI 26 and FDI 27. WLP was used as a reference method. Within each acquisition system, the maximum wear at each facet was analyzed by superimposing the STL data of t0 with t1–t3. A power analysis was performed (G*Power), and the Wilcoxon-signed-rank-test was used to evaluate whether there were statistically significant differences between the groups (Bonferroni corrected) (α = 0.05). At wear-facet FDI 27, differences from +4% t1 TD up to +19% t2 OC, corresponding to a metric value of 8 µm and 45 µm, were measured. At FDI 26 deviations between −2% t1 Tr3, and +10% OC and Tr3, were observed. Considering some limitations, the IOS are a promising alternative to wear measurement based on WLP due to its simple application to capture surface changes in a reasonable and quick way.

Highlights

  • The evaluation and monitoring of tooth wear are essential for therapeutic strategies and scientific purposes

  • Considering some limitations, the Intraoral Scanning System (IOS) are a promising alternative to wear measurement based on wear measurement compared to optical profilometry (WLP) due to its simple application to capture surface changes in a reasonable and quick way

  • Wear Measurement on the Basis of the IOS Compared to WLP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evaluation and monitoring of tooth wear are essential for therapeutic strategies and scientific purposes. Wear measurement is still predominantly based on a conventional workflow [1,2] by taking impressions and fabricating casts. Depending on the analytical method, different subsequent steps are essential. The cast can be digitized with a laboratory or an industrial high-resolution scanner [3,4,5,6].

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call