Abstract

Background: The experimental study of $g(Ig2)$ factors of nuclear states can provide information about the evolution of collectivity in certain regions of the nuclear chart, and assist in obtaining a microscopic description of the nuclear wave functions. The measurements and explanations of $g(Ig2)$ factors are still a challenge for experiments and theory.Purpose: Measurement of the $g({2}_{1}^{+})$ and $g({4}_{1}^{+})$ factors, the latter for the first time, in the ${\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}_{44}^{96}$Ru nucleus. Comparison of the experimental results with calculations using the shell model and collective models.Methods: The experiments made use of the transient field technique, using a Coulomb-excitation reaction in inverse kinematics. Large scale shell model calculations were performed; comparisons with previous theoretical predictions, using the tidal-wave model and the hydrodynamical model, were carried out.Results: The values of $g({2}_{1}^{+})=+0.46(2)$ and $g({4}_{1}^{+})=+0.58(8)$ were experimentally obtained. While the $g({2}_{1}^{+})$ value agrees with the hydrodynamical model prediction of $g=Z/A=+0.46$, the $g({4}_{1}^{+})$ is in agreement with the shell model predictions. The trend of the experimental $g$ factors, as a function of nuclear spin, is not reproduced by the theoretical models discussed.Conclusions: Measurements of $g({2}_{1}^{+})$ and $g({4}_{1}^{+})$ in ${}^{96}$Ru were performed. Further theoretical efforts are necessary to explain the trend of the $g$ factors as a function of nuclear spin for the ${}^{96}$Ru nucleus. Future measurements of $g({4}_{1}^{+})$ should reduce the uncertainty of the result.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call