Abstract
Orientation: Human resources (HR) practices and specifically the perceptions thereof are not only important for organisational strategy and performance but have a direct impact on employee attitudes and behaviour. The accurate measurement of these perceptions is therefore important.Research purpose: The goal of this study was to validate the Human Resource Practices Perceptions Questionnaire for the South African context (which is unique in terms of its apparent collectivistic nature), from an etic perspective.Motivation for the study: The accurate measurement of employees’ perception of HR practices are essential to give the organisation a competitive advantage. This study was done to validate a HR practices perceptions questionnaire in a seemingly collectivistic context.Research approach/design and method: This study is based on a cross-sectional survey design, collecting primary data on the perceptions of HR practices from 1676 South African employees in public and private sector organisations. An exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted.Main findings: The EFA and CFA yielded a slightly different permutation compared to the initial factor structure. A nine-factor structure was extracted and confirmed. A slight adjustment of the original questionnaire was required to incorporate performance evaluation with a teamwork focus and to differentiate training from development. It was further found that invariance exists when comparing the private and the public sectors.Practical/managerial implications: It was found that the instrument had to be adjusted for the South African context to ensure an accurate measurement of employees’ perceptions of HR practices.Contribution/value-add: The instrument has been validated and can thus be used with confidence to assess the perceptions of HR practices regardless of the sector. It thus provides an accurate measurement that can be used to predict or explain other employee behavioural outcomes in relation to their perceptions of the HR practices.
Highlights
IntroductionThe human resource (HR) function has a direct impact on organisational performance and on employee behaviour and attitudes (Choudhury & Mishra, 2010)
No organization can have exceptional performance without exceptional employees; and that requires exceptional human resource (HR) practices.(Enz & Sigaw, 2000:48)The human resource (HR) function has a direct impact on organisational performance and on employee behaviour and attitudes (Choudhury & Mishra, 2010)
The results reported for the two sample groups were χ2/df (571) = 2.24, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.90, root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05, expected crossvalidation index (ECVI) = 3.33 and χ2/df (571) = 2.35, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.05, ECVI = 2.59 for the private
Summary
The human resource (HR) function has a direct impact on organisational performance and on employee behaviour and attitudes (Choudhury & Mishra, 2010). This relationship is complex and one should guard against oversimplifying the nature thereof (Bowen & Ostroff, 2004; Nishii & Wright, 2008). Hartog, Boselie, and Paauwe (2011), the developers of the instrument investigated in this study, based their work on the premise that the perceptions of HR practices are essential for employees’ experiences in an organisation. It is based on the extent to which employees feel that the HR practices are offered to them
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have