Abstract

The pseudorapidity density of charged particles dN $$_{ ch }$$ /d $$\eta $$ is measured by the TOTEM experiment in proton–proton collisions at $$\sqrt{s} = 8$$ TeV within the range $$3.9<\eta <4.7$$ and $$-6.95<\eta <-6.9$$ . Data were collected in a low intensity LHC run with collisions occurring at a distance of 11.25 m from the nominal interaction point. The data sample is expected to include 96–97 % of the inelastic proton–proton interactions. The measurement reported here considers charged particles with $$p_T>0$$ MeV/c, produced in inelastic interactions with at least one charged particle in $$-7<\eta <-6$$ or $$3.7<\eta <4.8$$ . The dN $$_{ ch }$$ /d $$\eta $$ has been found to decrease with $$|\eta |$$ , from 5.11 $$\pm $$ 0.73 at $$\eta =3.95$$ to 1.81 $$\pm $$ 0.56 at $$\eta =-$$ 6.925. Several Monte Carlo generators are compared to the data and are found to be within the systematic uncertainty of the measurement.

Highlights

  • The pseudorapidity density of charged particles produced in high energy proton–proton collisions is a key observable for the characterization of the hadronic final state

  • Nonperturbative models are used in Monte Carlo (MC) event generators to describe the soft-QCD dynamics of the hadronic interaction [1,2]

  • The measurement is obtained for a sample of events recorded with a minimum bias trigger in pp collisions displaced by 11.25 m from the nominal interaction point (IP) location

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The pseudorapidity density of charged particles produced in high energy proton–proton (pp) collisions is a key observable for the characterization of the hadronic final state. The measurement is obtained for a sample of events recorded with a minimum bias trigger in pp collisions displaced by 11.25 m from the nominal interaction point (IP) location. These events have at least one charged particle with either 3.7 < η < 4.8 or −7 < η < −6 and are corrected to include charged particles with transverse momentum down to pT = 0 MeV/c. The analysis reported here follows closely the ones reported in [6,7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.