Abstract
We report a measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation from the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment with nearly 4million reactor ν[over ¯]_{e} inverse β decay candidates observed over 1958days of data collection. The installation of a flash analog-to-digital converter readout system and a special calibration campaign using different source enclosures reduce uncertainties in the absolute energy calibration to less than 0.5% for visible energies larger than 2MeV. The uncertainty in the cosmogenic ^{9}Li and ^{8}He background is reduced from 45% to 30% in the near detectors. A detailed investigation of the spent nuclear fuel history improves its uncertainty from 100% to 30%. Analysis of the relative ν[over ¯]_{e} rates and energy spectra among detectors yields sin^{2}2θ_{13}=0.0856±0.0029 and Δm_{32}^{2}=(2.471_{-0.070}^{+0.068})×10^{-3} eV^{2} assuming the normal hierarchy, and Δm_{32}^{2}=-(2.575_{-0.070}^{+0.068})×10^{-3} eV^{2} assuming the inverted hierarchy.
Highlights
We report a measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation from the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment with nearly 4 million reactor νe inverse β decay candidates observed over 1958 days of data collection
This Letter presents a measurement of these two parameters with a data set acquired in 1958 days of stable operation, and with several improvements to the analysis when compared with previous measurements
The inner acrylic vessel is filled with 20-t 0.1% gadolinium-doped liquid scintillator (Gd LS), which serves as the primary νe target
Summary
The Daya Bay experiment previously reported the observation of a nonzero value of sin2 2θ13 via the disappearance of reactor antineutrinos over ∼kilometer distances [1], and a measurement of the effective mass-squared difference Δm2ee via the distortion of the νe energy spectrum [6]. Both of these measurements based on 1230 days of operation are described in detail in Ref. The readout system underestimates the charge of the PMT signals when they overlap in time due to the AC coupling of the front end electronics This results in a nonlinear response of the charge over the entire detector at the ∼10% level in the energy region of interest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have