Abstract
A comparison has been made between the use of two types of pH microelectrode and the weak acid method for determining the cytoplasmic pH of Nitella translucens at an external pH of 6. There was good agreement between the value obtained with glass pH microelectrodes (7.54 +/- 0.15 se) and that obtained using the weak acid 5,5-dimethyloxazolidine-2,4-dione (7.42 +/- 0.07 se). Plastic-insulated antimony microelectrodes gave a significantly lower value (6.74 +/- 0.15 se) possibly due to disruption of the insulation by the cell wall. The addition of 1 mM NaN(3) rapidly reduced the pH recorded by the glass pH microelectrodes to about 5.3. A smaller change was observed using the weak acid method. The relevance of this observation to recent work on indoleacetic acid transport is discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
