Measurement of the chemotaxis coefficient for human neutrophils in the under-agarose migration assay.

Abstract

Clinical and scientific investigations of leukocyte chemotaxis will be greatly aided by an ability to measure quantitative parameters characterizing the intrinsic random motility, chemokinetic, and chemotactic properties of cell populations responding to a given attractant. Quantities typically used at present, such as leading front distances, migrating cell numbers, etc., are unsatisfactory in this regard because their values are affected by many aspects of the assay system unrelated to cell behavioral properties. In this paper we demonstrate the measurement of cell migration parameters that do, in fact, characterize the intrinsic cell chemosensory movement responses using cell density profiles obtained in the linear under-agarose assay. These parameters are the random motility coefficient, mu, and the chemotaxis coefficient, chi, which appear in a theoretical expression for cell population migration. We propose a priori the dependence of chi on attractant concentration, based on an independent experimental correlation of individual cell orientation bias in an attractant gradient with a spatial difference in receptor occupancy. Our under-agarose population migration results are consistent with this proposition, allowing chemotaxis to be reliably characterized by a chemotactic sensitivity constant, chi 0, to which chi is directly proportional. Further, chi 0 has fundamental significance; it represents the reciprocal of the difference in number of bound receptors across cell dimensions required for directional orientation bias. In particular, for the system of human peripheral blood polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes responding to FNLLP, we find that the chemotaxis coefficient is a function of attractant concentration, a following the expression: chi = chi 0NT0 f(a) S(a) Kd/(Kd + a)2 where Kd is the FNLLP-receptor equilibrium dissociation constant and NT0 is the total number of cell surface receptors for FNLLP. f(a) is the fraction of surface receptors remaining after down-regulation, and S(a) is the cell movement speed, both known functions of FNLLP concentration. We find that chi 0NT0 = 0.2 cm; according to a theoretical argument outlined in the Appendix this means that these cells exhibit 75% orientation toward higher attractant concentration when the absolute spatial difference in bound receptors is 0.0025NT0 over 10 micron. (For example, if NT0 = 50,000 this would correspond to a spatial difference of 125 bound receptors over 10 micron.) This result can be compared with estimates obtained from visual studies of individual neutrophils.