Abstract

Scientific discussions have emphasized that the main problem with the current deposit insurance system is that the current system does not evaluate the risks that banks assume to calculate the deposit insurance premiums in many countries of the European Union (E.U.). Thus, the prevailing system does not safeguard a sufficient level of stability in the banking system. Scientific studies show that the deposit insurance system should consider not only the risk indicators for individual banks, but it must also consider the systemic risk of banks that affects the stability of the banking system. Hence, the question arises as to whether measurements of systemic risk in a common E.U. risk-based deposit insurance system are a formal necessity or if they are a value-adding process. Expanding the discussion of scientists, this article analyzes how contributions to insurance funds would change the banks of Lithuania following the introduction of the E.U.’s overall risk-based deposit insurance system and after taking into consideration the additional systemic risk. The research results that were obtained provide evidence that the introduction of a risk-based deposit insurance system would redistribute payments to the deposit insurance fund between banks operating in Lithuania, and, thereby, would contribute to a reduction in the negative effects of the deposit insurance system and would improve the stability in the financial system.

Highlights

  • One of the major ways in which banks raise funds is through deposit-taking

  • Scientific discussions (Bernet and Walter 2009; Gerhardt and Lannoo 2011; Gómez-Fernández-Aguado and Partal-Ureña 2013) that have been conducted previously cover the main types of financing for deposit insurance systems that are prevalent, such as ex-ante, ex-post, and mixed, because all of the deposit insurance contributions that are made up until the occurrence of the insured event are valid in 13 E.U. countries, which is based on the regular collection of contributions to the fund

  • The deposit insurance systems that are valid in the E.U. provide insufficient protection for depositors, since contributions are not based on a risk assessment of the banks, which means that one of the basic functions of deposit insurance is not considered

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the major ways in which banks raise funds is through deposit-taking. The importance of this activity for banks is undeniable, and the major effective principles of a deposit insurance system have been defined by the Bank for International Settlements (Bank for International Settlements 2014). Scientific discussions (Bernet and Walter 2009; Gerhardt and Lannoo 2011; Gómez-Fernández-Aguado and Partal-Ureña 2013) that have been conducted previously cover the main types of financing for deposit insurance systems that are prevalent, such as ex-ante, ex-post, and mixed, because all of the deposit insurance contributions that are made up until the occurrence of the insured event are valid in 13 E.U. countries, which is based on the regular collection of contributions to the fund. The deposit insurance systems that are valid in the E.U. provide insufficient protection for depositors, since contributions are not based on a risk assessment of the banks, which means that one of the basic functions of deposit insurance is not considered. E.U. risk-assessment-based deposit insurance system that is in accordance with the methodology that is presented in the European Banking Authority’s guidelines (Model 1). The final section presents the conclusions that have been drawn through the research

Literature Review
Study Data and Methodology
Systemic risk level in the institution
Analysis of Results and Comments
Stock return histograms of Lithuanian banks years
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call