Abstract
The closed acetylene reduction assay has been used as a measure of nitrogenase activity and an indicator of N2 fixation in Rhizobium/legume symbioses for 25 years. However, starting 10 years ago this assay has come under harsh criticism as being inaccurate. Currently, confusion exists regarding the conditions under which the acetylene reduction assay can be used accurately, or whether it can be used at all as a measure of nitrogenase activity. This article reviews the circumstance that has lead to this confusion. The author argues that under the proper assay conditions and with the appropriate checks, the closed acetylene reduction assay is still a valuable tool in assessing relative differences in nitrogenase activity in Rhizobium/legume symbioses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
