Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is an important carbon pool susceptible to land‐use change (LUC). There are concerns that converting grasslands into the C4 bioenergy crop Miscanthus (to meet demands for renewable energy) could negatively impact SOC, resulting in reductions of greenhouse gas mitigation benefits gained from using Miscanthus as a fuel. This work addresses these concerns by sampling soils (0–30 cm) from a site 12 years (T12) after conversion from marginal agricultural grassland into Miscanthus x giganteus and four other novel Miscanthus hybrids. Soil samples were analysed for changes in below‐ground biomass, SOC and Miscanthus contribution to SOC (using a 13C natural abundance approach). Findings are compared to ECOSSE soil carbon model results (run for a LUC from grassland to Miscanthus scenario and continued grassland counterfactual), and wider implications are considered in the context of life cycle assessments based on the heating value of the dry matter (DM) feedstock. The mean T12 SOC stock at the site was 8 (±1 standard error) Mg C/ha lower than baseline time zero stocks (T0), with assessment of the five individual hybrids showing that while all had lower SOC stock than at T0 the difference was only significant for a single hybrid. Over the longer term, new Miscanthus C4 carbon replaces pre‐existing C3 carbon, though not at a high enough rate to completely offset losses by the end of year 12. At the end of simulated crop lifetime (15 years), the difference in SOC stocks between the two scenarios was 4 Mg C/ha (5 g CO2‐eq/MJ). Including modelled LUC‐induced SOC loss, along with carbon costs relating to soil nitrous oxide emissions, doubled the greenhouse gas intensity of Miscanthus to give a total global warming potential of 10 g CO2‐eq/MJ (180 kg CO2‐eq/Mg DM).
Highlights
Energy generation from fossil fuels must be phased out as part of world‐wide efforts to combat the impacts of climate change (IPCC, 2014)
Agricultural grasslands represent a third of the utilized agricultural area across Europe (Eurostat, 2018) and due to changes in farming subsidies and temperate grassland agricultural management across Europe, areas of lower grade agricultural grassland may become available for biomass crops (Donnison & Fraser, 2016; Taube, Gierus, Hermann, Loges, & Schönbach, 2014)
The carbon cost relating to the difference in predicted Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks between the continued grassland and land‐use change (LUC) to Miscanthus x giganteus (Mxg) scenarios of 4 Mg C/ha equates to 5 g CO2‐eq/MJ based on the energy content of the estimated 15 year yield
Summary
Aberystwyth University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Grant/Award Number: BB/CSP1730/1 and BBS/E/W/10963A01B; European Commission FACCE SURPLUS ERA‐ NET MISCOMAR, Grant/Award Number: 652615; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Grant/Award Number: EP/M013200/1; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Grant/Award Number: NF0426
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.