Abstract

AbstractMeasurements and estimates of evaporation have been routinely carried out for over a century. In the United Kingdom the most well‐known method of estimating evaporation and its derivatives such as soil moisture deficit (SMD) is the Meteorological Office Rainfall and Evaporation Calculation System (MORECS) which is based on the Penman‐Monteith equation. Direct measurements of evaporation have become less common in recent years. A comparison of measurements and estimates of evaporation and SMD at a single site and over two catchment areas is presented in this paper. Measurements of actual evaporation from a grassed lysimeter have been achieved for the period 1995–98 and they agree well with catchment losses over the same time period in two natural catchments, the Upper Brue and Upper Cary. In contrast to this, MORECS estimates of actual evaporation are different by an average of +20% for the Upper Brue catchment and +27% for the Upper Cary catchment. The largest difference is nearly +40% for the Upper Cary catchment. Similarly, there are substantial differences in the estimates of SMD, often up to 50 mm. When local rainfall is used together with MORECS estimates of potential evaporation the discrepancy is reduced but significant differences remain during much of the growing season, although improvements do occur. The results from this paper will be of great importance to growers, water resource planners, engineers who give flood warnings, and to river flow modellers. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call