Abstract

The present reliance on lexicogrammaticalaccuracy seems to be an impoverished construct on whichto assess students’ understanding and students’ ability toproductively interact and use engineering concepts inteam settings. I propose supplementing accuracy with theconcepts of agility and efficacy because meaning-makingseems to be more critical to a student’s ability tosuccessfully engage in the complex process ofcommunication than accuracy alone. However, beforethese can be assessed it is necessary to determine whatmeaning-making, agility and efficacy look like in practice.This study examines emergent meaning-making practicesof video-recorded team meetings in two first-yearengineering design courses. Analysis revealed thatlexicogrammatical accuracy did not reflect a team’s orindividual’s ability to communicate-to make meaning.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call