Abstract

Distancing in the food system prevents people from having full knowledge and making informed choices about what and how they produce, exchange, prepare, and eat food. This becomes problematic when the dominant industrial food system contributes to myriad negative human health, ecological, and social outcomes. This paper reports on findings from a study that aimed to better understand distancing from the perspectives of people engaged in resisting it, focusing on their motivations for action to inform policy approaches to improve food system health. The research, conducted in India and Canada, comprised participant observation with organizations working to connect the production and consumption of food, as well as interviews with activists, consumers, and farmers involved with those organizations. These food system actors were motivated primarily by a conviction that food is important, which was illustrated by meaningful relationships built and maintained through food, by soulful connections with food, and by a sense that everything – including food – is interconnected. The findings identify connection around food as a source of meaning in life. From meaning comes awareness of broader issues, a sense of value and care, and ultimately motivation for action or change. This could have implications for healthy food system governance if frameworks such as determinants of health and healthy food environments are used to inform healthy public policies that cultivate a sense of meaning and awareness of the intrinsic value embedded in food.

Highlights

  • Food system distancing is the physical and conceptual gap between people and food (BlayPalmer, 2008; Clapp, 2012; Kloppenburg, Hendrickson, & Stevenson, 1996; Kneen, 1993)

  • This study used an assets approach to learn from people who were finding ways to resist distancing in the food system

  • In an industrialized food system that masks the value of food, cultivating population-level recognition that food is deeply important could be a path toward positive change

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Food system distancing is the physical and conceptual gap between people and food (BlayPalmer, 2008; Clapp, 2012; Kloppenburg, Hendrickson, & Stevenson, 1996; Kneen, 1993). Distancing is a form of deskilling whereby people lose control over their personal food system because they do not or cannot understand the system through which the food is produced (Braverman, 1974). They lack the “information, knowledge, and analytical frameworks needed to make informed decisions that reflect their own ‘fully costed’ interests” Physical and conceptual distancing are side effects of the increased processing and global integration characteristic of the industrialized food system. While consumers have experienced distancing, the food system has become more connected through the global flows of food, workers, and eaters. As the breadth of connections expanded, depth of meaning and relationship have eroded

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call