Meaning and morphosyntax II: verb meaning and argument structure

Abstract

CHAPTER PREVIEW This chapter discusses the semantics of the clause, particularly the relationship between a verb and its noun participants. This relationship is called the verb's argument structure. There are three basic questions: What principles determine which of the noun phrases associated with a transitive verb will be expressed as subject and which as object? Can verbs be grouped into classes about which argument structure generalizations can be made? Can constructions have meanings on their own? We begin by looking at the semantics of argument structure, a central topic in investigation of the way semantics and syntax are connected. We introduce and motivate the notion of thematic role , and go on to consider the modifications this notion has undergone in research into argument structure (10.1). We then consider argument structure alternations , (10.2), the name for situations where a single verb can take several different argument structures. Lastly, we consider construction grammar, which attributes many apparently lexical meanings to the grammatical constructions in which they occur (10.3). Verbs and participants As the core of the clause, verbs play an important role in the interaction between meaning and syntax. This is because verbs are typically accompanied by nouns which refer to the participants in the event or state the verb describes. These participants receive a range of morphosyntactic markers -case suffixes, subject or object markers, etc. – specifying which participant is the ‘actor’ or instigator of the action, which the undergoer of the action, as well as other possible roles.