Abstract

This paper investigates the benefits of deliberately unbalancing operation time means for unreliable non-automated production lines. The lines were simulated with various line lengths, buffer capacities, degrees of imbalance and patterns of imbalance. Data on two performance measures, namely throughput and average buffer level were gathered, analyzed and compared to a balanced line counterpart. A number of conclusions were made with respect to the ranking of configurations, as well as to the relationships among the independent design parameters and the dependent variables. It was found that the best configurations are a balanced line arrangement and a monotone decreasing order, with the first generally resulting in lower throughput and the second leading to lower average buffer levels than those of a balanced line. Preliminary results show that unbalanced lines cope well with unreliability.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.