Abstract

AbstractIn the present work, we propose a robust calibration of some bi‐parametric multiaxial fatigue criteria applied in conjunction with the theory of critical distances (TCD). This is based on least‐square fitting fatigue data generated using plain and sharp‐notched specimens tested at two different load ratios and allows for the estimation of the critical distance according to the point and line method formulation of TCD. It is shown that this combination permits to incorporate the mean stress effect into the fatigue strength calculation, which is not accounted for in the classical formulation of TCD based on the range of the maximum principal stress. It is also shown that for those materials exhibiting a low fatigue‐strength‐to‐yield‐stress ratio σfl,R = −1/σYS, such as 7075‐T6 (σfl,R = −1/σYS = 0.30), satisfactorily accurate predictions are obtained assuming a linear‐elastic stress distribution, even at the tip of sharp notches and cracks. Conversely, for any materials characterized by higher values of this ratio, as quenched and tempered 42CrMo4 (σfl,R = −1/σYS = 0.54), it is recommended to consider the stabilized elastic‐plastic stress/strain distribution, also for plain and blunt‐notched samples and even in the high cycle fatigue regime still with the application of the TCD.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call