Meade, Bees, and Externalities

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessMeade, Bees, and ExternalitiesDavid B. JohnsonDavid B. Johnson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 16, Number 1Apr., 1973 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/466754 Views: 16Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1973 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Elodie Bertrand Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests), (Dec 2021): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-2Steven G. Medema “Exceptional and Unimportant”?, History of Political Economy 52, no.11 (Oct 2019): 135–170.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8009583Hyunok Lee, Daniel A. Sumner, Antoine Champetier Pollination Markets and the Coupled Futures of Almonds and Honey Bees: Simulating Impacts of Shifts in Demands and Costs, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 101, no.11 (Aug 2018): 230–249.https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay063Elodie Bertrand Coase Theorem: Empirical Tests, (Apr 2019): 256–262.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_628Elodie Bertrand Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests), (Jul 2017): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-1Richard E. Wagner The Peculiar Business of Politics, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2812368Tore Ellingsen, Elena Paltseva The private provision of excludable public goods: An inefficiency result, Journal of Public Economics 96, no.9-109-10 (Oct 2012): 658–669.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.010Randal R. Rucker, Walter N. Thurman, Michael Burgett Honey Bee Pollination Markets and the Internalization of Reciprocal Benefits, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94, no.44 (Jul 2012): 956–977.https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas031Dharam P. Abrol Value of Bee Pollination, (Sep 2011): 185–222.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1942-2_7Elodie Bertrand What do cattle and bees tell us about the Coase theorem?, European Journal of Law and Economics 31, no.11 (Nov 2010): 39–62.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-010-9195-6Mike H. Allsopp, Willem J. de Lange, Ruan Veldtman, Andy Hector Valuing Insect Pollination Services with Cost of Replacement, PLoS ONE 3, no.99 (Sep 2008): e3128.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003128David C. Cook, Matthew B. Thomas, Saul A. Cunningham, Denis L. Anderson, Paul J. De Barro PREDICTING THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AN INVASIVE SPECIES ON AN ECOSYSTEM SERVICE, Ecological Applications 17, no.66 (Sep 2007): 1832–1840.https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1632.1Rachel F. Baskerville Icons of Repute: The Attribution of Lamarckian and Darwinian Evolutionary Mechanisms in Economics, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1220863Elodie Bertrand The Coasean analysis of lighthouse financing: myths and realities, Cambridge Journal of Economics 30, no.33 (Oct 2005): 389–402.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei068Martin Zelder The Cost of Accosting Coase: A Reconciliatory Survey of Proofs and Disproofs of the Coase Theorem, (Jan 1998): 65–94.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5350-8_4Harold Demsetz The core disagreement between Pigou, the profession, and Coase in the analyses of the externality question, European Journal of Political Economy 12, no.44 (Dec 1996): 565–579.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00025-0Vladimir Matveenko Development with positive externalities: The case of the Russian economy, Journal of Policy Modeling 17, no.33 (Jun 1995): 207–221.https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(94)00028-EIrvine Lapsley INCOME MEASUREMENT AT A STATE RAILWAY CORPORATION: THE 'SOCIAL PROFIT'ILLUSION?., Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 8, no.44 (Dec 1981): 529–547.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1981.tb00833.x