Abstract

BackgroundCongenital pulmonary artery anomalies are variable and need proper diagnosis and treatment. CT angiography with multiplanar reconstruction has the main role in the assessment of these anomalies and this non-invasive method should be the method of choice for preoperative planning and postoperative follow up.The aim of the study is to assess the value of MDCT in the detection of pulmonary arteries anomalies in the pediatric population with complex congenital heart disease in conjunction with echocardiography as an alternative to conventional angiography and to determine the superiority of MDCT in the assessment of other abnormalities such as airway anomalies.ResultsIn our retrospective study, 52 patients (28 male and 24 females, aged 1 day to 4 years: mean age 2 years) were examined with contrast-enhanced CT. CT examinations were done using a 128-section CT scanner (Siemens Somatom Definition AS) using non-ionic iodinated contrast media. 2D and 3D reconstructions were performed. The correlation was made with echocardiograms. All imaging studies were reviewed. The echo was done to all patients. Surgery and/or catheter angiography performed to all patients, their findings were reviewed and compared to CTA findings. Other abnormalities such as congenital airway anomalies are detected using axial MDCT images and reconstructed imaging techniques.MDCT was accurate in revealing pulmonary artery anomalies. The commonest pulmonary artery anomaly was atresia, stenosis then hypoplasia. These anomalies may be isolated or associated with other congenital heart diseases. In the current study, MDCT could diagnose all cases of pulmonary arterial anomalies with 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 98% accuracy, 100% positive, and 94% negative predictive values. CT scans provide accurate information to assess complex spatial relationships of vascular airway compression frequently associated with CHD in the pediatric population.ConclusionMDCT scanner can be an alternative to diagnostic conventional angiography for the non-invasive assessment of the pulmonary artery. Higher quality multiplanar and 3D reconstruction achieved by the MDCT scanners offer a rapid, reliable and non-invasive technique that can be used for the evaluation and preoperative assessment of thoracic vascular and extra-vascular anatomy in infants and children with suspected congenital heart disease. CT technologies are constantly developing collaboration between radiologists, pediatric cardiologists, and anesthesiologists, which is essential for improving CT performance.

Highlights

  • Congenital pulmonary artery anomalies are variable and need proper diagnosis and treatment

  • Multi-Detector computed tomography (MDCT) could diagnose all cases of pulmonary arterial anomalies with 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 98% accuracy, 100% positive, and 94% negative predictive values (Table 2)

  • The most common associated finding is Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), followed by stenosis of pulmonary artery in 13 cases (25%), 6 cases type I, 4 cases type II, 3 cases type III, and no case in our study found type IV Figure 4 shows type I pulmonary stenosis, hypoplasia of main pulmonary artery in 10 cases (20%) or its main branches (Fig. 1) and pulmonary artery dilatation in 8 cases (Figs. 5 and 6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Congenital pulmonary artery anomalies are variable and need proper diagnosis and treatment. The aim of the study is to assess the value of MDCT in the detection of pulmonary arteries anomalies in the pediatric population with complex congenital heart disease in conjunction with echocardiography as an alternative to conventional angiography and to determine the superiority of MDCT in the assessment of other abnormalities such as airway anomalies. CT angiography (CTA) is an important modality in the evaluation of pediatric congenital heart disease (CHD). It can be used for the accurate depiction of complex cardiovascular anatomic features both before and after surgery and of a variety of post-treatment complications. Echocardiogram and conventional angiography are usually known as the primary imaging for assessment of CHD, echocardiography may not be enough for evaluating the extracardiac structures, such as great vessels due to acoustic window limitations [2, 3]. Compared with CT, cardiac angiography has more risks because of its invasive nature [4, 5], it needs anesthesia and a large volume of contrast injection [4], and more radiation exposure to the patient [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call