Abstract

225Ac-PSMA-617, targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which is overexpressed on prostate cancer cells, has shown a remarkable therapeutic efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC). Here, we report on treatment outcome and survival using this novel treatment modality in a series of 53 patients with mCRPC directly after their androgen deprivation treatment (ADT). Methods: 225Ac-PSMA-617 was administered to 53 such patients. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was obtained at baseline, before every treatment cycle, and on follow-up to select patients for treatment, determine the activity to be administered, and assess their response. Serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements were obtained for response assessment. Results: The median age of the patients was 63.4 y (range, 45-83 y). In total, 167 cycles were administered (median, 3; range, 1-7). Forty-eight patients (91%) had a PSA decline of at least 50%, and 51 patients (96%) had any decline in PSA. 68Ga-PSMA PET findings became negative in 30 patients. In the multivariate analysis, a PSA decline of at least 50% proved predictive of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and platelet count also proved predictive for PFS. The median estimated OS was 9 mo for patients with a PSA decline of less than 50% but was not yet reached at the latest follow-up (55 mo) for patients with a PSA decline of 50% or more. The estimated median PFS was 22 mo for patients with a PSA decline of at least 50% and 4 mo for patients with a PSA decline of less than 50%. No severe hematotoxicity was noted, and only 3 patients had grade III-IV nephrotoxicity. The commonest toxicity seen was grade I-II xerostomia, observed in 81% of patients. Conclusion: In 91% of 53 patients with mCRPC, treatment with 225Ac-PSMA-617 immediately after ADT resulted in at least a 50% decrease in PSA level. Furthermore, a PSA decline of at least 50% proved the single most important factor predicting PFS and OS after 225Ac-PSMA-617 treatment. Of interest, median OS in patients with a PSA decline of at least 50% was not yet reached at the latest follow-up (55 mo). These favorable results suggest that it would be of major clinical relevance to perform a prospective randomized study comparing 225Ac-PSMA-617 with current standard-of-care treatment options such as enzalutamide, abiraterone acetate, and docetaxel after ADT.

Highlights

  • 225Ac-PSMA-617, targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) which is overexpressed on prostate cancer cells, has shown a remarkable therapeutic efficacy in heavily pre-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma patients

  • In this series on 53 patients suffering from mCRPC, treatment with 225Ac-PSMA-617 administered immediately following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), resulted in a > 50% decrease in prostate specific antigen (PSA) level in 91% of the patients

  • A PSA decline of greater than or equal to 50% proved the single most important factor predicting Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following 225Ac-PSMA-617 treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We report on treatment outcome and survival using this novel treatment modality in a series of 53 metastatic castration resistant prostate carcinoma patients directly following their androgen deprivation treatment. Standard of care treatment for metastatic prostate carcinoma is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) which normalizes serum levels of prostate-specific antigen and produces an objective tumor response in over 90 percent of patients. Most of the patients suffering from metastatic prostate carcinoma eventually experience disease progression despite initial favorable response to ADT within an average of 1836 months following treatment initiation [4,5]. Once ADT-resistant or castration-resistant, metastatic prostate carcinoma patients (mCRPC) are treated by other treatment options such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, chemotherapy, 223Radium dichloride, or Sipuleucel-T, the choice of which depends substantially on patient preference, current symptoms burden of disease and local availability [5]. Abiraterone and enzalutamide are not accessible to most patients

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call