“MCL Repair, Isolated Suture-tape Bracing and No Repair for Grade III MCL Tears During ACL Reconstruction Have Similar Outcome for Combined ACL With MCL Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.”

Abstract

Aim of the study was to compare various MCL management strategies(repair vs isolated suture-tape bracing vs no repair) combined with ACL reconstruction and analyse results of MCL sub-types (femoral/mid-substance/tibial-sided tears) occurring at distinct levels. This study is a double blinded prospective randomised controlled trial. 96 consecutive patients with combined ACL and grade III MCL between 2020 and 2023 with minimum follow up of 24 months were included in the study. Chronic MCL and other ligament injuries were excluded, and computer-generated randomisation was done for allotment into three MCL management groups. ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft was performed and MCL treated by repair in group 1(n=33), isolated suture-tape bracing -group 2(n=32) and no repair-group 3(n=31). At follow-up, stress radiographs were utilized to analyse anterior and medial laxity. IKDC, Lysholm, KOOS scores, duration of surgery and cost of surgery were compared. Also, subgroup analysis was performed to assess outcomes based on location of MCL injury. Demographic data, duration of injury, mode of injury and level of MCL injury is similar across groups. Over all MCL tears-femoral side, mid-substance and tibial side were 58.3%,18.7%and 23.0% respectively. Post-operatively significant improvement in ROM and functional score was observed in all three groups(P=<0.05); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups at final follow-up in anterior tibial translation(P=0.94), medial opening in 0°(P=0.8) & 30°(P=0.64), ROM(P=0.39), IKDC(P=0.17), Lysholm(P=0.14) & KOOS(P=0.68). Three patients in group 2 had stiffness at 3months; two were treated with CPM and physiotherapy and 1 patient needed arthrolysis. Medial opening(00 and 300) was greater in group 3- mid-substance MCL tear patients(P=0.042,0.043). On Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) analysis more than 80% of patients had improvement in range of motion, functional scores and medial opening less than 5mm, suggestive of successful outcome in all the three groups. The duration of surgery was longer in repair group(P=0.001), whereas cost was higher in the suture-tape bracing group(P=0.003). Repair, isolated suture-tape bracing and no repair treatments of MCL result in good radiological (medial stress laxity) and functional outcomes when combined with ACL reconstruction. MCL Repair or isolated suture-tape bracing restore better medial side stability. Mid-substance MCL tears may need additional procedure(repair/bracing) to restore medial stability.