Mayor presupuesto no genera celeridad procesal y plazo razonable en el Tribunal Constitucional, Perú 1999 – 2020

Abstract

The objective of the research was to demonstrate the hypothesis that greater budgets do not generate greater procedural speed in the Constitutional Court of Peru (TC), restricting access to a reasonable time period between 1999-2020. At the methodological level, data was collected from 22 years of Constitutional Court (TC) sentences. From the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), the accruals of the transferred budget. In addition, Pearson's Rho and discriminant analysis for clusters were used. The results highlight that the procedural burden depends on the actions of amparo, habeas corpus and non-compliance with an R2 of 99.93%. There is a delay in resolving lawsuits, while the budget grows. The Rho is 0.245. If the budget grows by 10%, publications would increase by 2.45%. Remunerations grow 7 times in the period and resolutions by 2.36 times. The Rho ratio is 0.33. The discriminant analysis proves that, of the three stages, 1999-2002; 2003-2012; and 2013-2020, in the third stage productivity and celerity decrease, while budgets increase. The processed information allows concluding that the public management of the (TC) does not show procedural celerity in the resolution of the files, in terms of access to justice in a reasonable time.