Abstract
Placing Richard Kearney within the category of 'lovers' rather than 'theorists' among those thinkers engaged in the quest for God, the author subjects Kearney's recent book The God Who May Be to a sympathetic but critical analysis. Special attention is paid to the ambiguities of trying to think about God in terms of possibility. Different senses of possibility are explored, and not all of them are to be attributed to God. Without proper discrimination between these different senses, we might be tempted to make of the God of possibility an idol rather than an icon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
