Abstract

AbstractWe interpreted the spatial clustering and size distribution of induced microseismicity observed during the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system beneath Basel by comparison with scale‐invariant synthetic data derived from discrete fracture network models. We evaluated microseimic specific influential factors including the effect of hypocentral location uncertainties, existence of a fractured zone and repeating events on the observed spatial organization. Using a dual power‐law model originally developed in the context of discrete fracture network modeling, we developed theoretically the relationships among spatial clustering and magnitude distributions. We applied this model to the Basel data set and showed that the spatial clustering characteristics presented stationary properties during the hydraulic stimulation. Based on this observation, we proposed a statistical seismicity model calibrated on the scaling of early stimulation spatial patterns that is capable of forecasting the maximum magnitude of induced events with increasing injection time and stimulated volume.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.