Abstract

In the field of Compressed Sensing, estimation of sparsity level is very essential as the sparsity level determines the minimum number of (i) measurements to be obtained of a sparse signal during acquisition and (ii) iterations to be performed for many of the greedy techniques for the perfect recovery of the sparse signal from the obtained measurements. In this paper, we propose a Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimator to estimate the instantaneous sparsity level during acquisition and an ML sequence (MLS) estimator of sparsity levels during recovery. As the sparsity level varies in time due to the continuous birth of newer supporting components and death of existing supporting components, this paper models the sparsity level variation as a stochastic birth-death process. The real-world applications of the proposed estimators are presented on the compression of aircraft vibration signals and the estimation of wireless channels. The simulation results on real-world and model-generated data demonstrate the performance merits of the proposed estimators compared to other existing methods.

Highlights

  • I N recent years, Compressed Sensing (CS) [1]–[5] has emerged as a powerful technique for acquiring high-dimensional sparse signals with fewer measurements than what is dictated by classical Shannon-Nyquist theory

  • In the CS recovery process, the N −dimensional sparse signal is reconstructed from those m CS measurements using either convex relaxation based algorithms [6]–[8] or greedy techniques [9], [10] with the prior knowledge of the sensing basis involved during acquisition

  • To determine the minimum number of Binary Sensing sub-Matrix (BSM) measurements required for obtaining an accurate estimate of sparsity level of the underlying sparse signal, one can minimize the variance of τs

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

I N recent years, Compressed Sensing (CS) [1]–[5] has emerged as a powerful technique for acquiring high-dimensional sparse signals with fewer measurements than what is dictated by classical Shannon-Nyquist theory. The collection of indices of those active components forms the support S and the cardinality of the set S is the sparsity level k. In the CS acquisition process, m samples or measurements are obtained using m × N −dimensional random or deterministic sensing basis, where m < N , and m ≥ ck log(N/k) for some constant c [4], [5]. In the CS recovery process, the N −dimensional sparse signal is reconstructed from those m CS measurements using either convex relaxation based algorithms [6]–[8] or greedy techniques [9], [10] with the prior knowledge of the sensing basis involved during acquisition. The basic theoretical concepts underlying CS can be found in [11]

NEED FOR SPARSITY LEVEL ESTIMATION
RELATED LITERATURE
KEY CONTRIBUTIONS
MODELING OF CS ACQUISITION SYSTEM AND
CS ACQUISITION MODEL
DISCRETE MARKOV BIRTH-DEATH MODELING OF SPARSITY LEVEL
STATISTICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SPARSITY LEVEL VARIATION
CONSTRUCTION OF BSM
PROPERTIES OF KML ESTIMATOR
EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION
IMPROVING SPARSITY LEVEL ESTIMATES DURING RECOVERY
VITERBI ALGORITHM
ML ESTIMATION OF MARKOV MODEL PARAMETERS
PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
Findings
IMPLEMENTATION OF VITERBI ALGORITHM IN CS RECOVERY SYSTEM
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.